Pilot measurement summary (public)

Gap 1 & Gap 2 · n = 63 · pre-extraction calibration

Public summary statistics from the PPCS aerobic pilot audit. No restricted links.

Summary for Foundation Stack readers (pilot calibration). This is not formal systematic-review pooling.

Gap 1 — adherence in Results

Category n %
Truly objective 11 17.5%
Truly not reported 40 63.5%
Explicitly not measured 8 12.7%
Subjective only 4 6.3%

Pseudo-objectivity gap: automated first pass flagged 41.3% as objective (hardware in Methods); manual verification left 17.5% truly objective — 23.8 percentage points.

Rule: hardware in Methods ≠ adherence reported in Results.

Gap 2 — recovery endpoints

Finding Count
Fully objective primary endpoint 0 / 63
BCTT-class (partially_objective) 10 / 63 (15.9%)
Symptom scales / composite / unclear 53 / 63

Co-occurrence (largest cells)

  • 24 / 63: no quantified adherence and unclear primary outcome structure
  • 8 / 63: no adherence + BCTT-class primary measure
  • 6 / 63: no adherence + symptom-scale primary

8 of 11 papers with truly objective adherence used a composite primary outcome.

Open figures (guanglab.org)

Limitations

Pilot n = 63 convenience-complete PDFs; ~78 additional full texts pending. Patterns may change when the full aerobic corpus is coded.

← Foundation Stack hub